Find your rep

Petitions · UK Parliament

Automatic extension for Non- Molestation order when it is breached

Signatures
10,263
Status
open
Closes
15 December 2026

The Government should change the law so that Non-Molestation Orders must be automatically extended where an abuser has breached the order and been convicted. Victims should not be forced to relive trauma through further statements and court hearings to prove an already established danger.

More details

Victims seeking to extend a Non-Molestation Order can be forced to relive trauma, submit new statements, and attend hearings, even when an abuser has already breached the order and been convicted. This causes unnecessary stress on the victim and added pressure on the courts. Where a breach has led to conviction and for offences such as stalking and/or harassment or violence, Non-Molestation Orders should be automatically extended without victims having to repeatedly prove the danger they face.

The government's response

The Government recognises that returning to court after a breach of a non-molestation order (NMO) can be distressing and retraumatising for victims of domestic abuse. We understand the concerns raised in this petition and are committed to ensuring victims are protected and perpetrators are held to account. NMOs are made by the family court under the Family Law Act 1996 to protect victims, and where appropriate relevant children, from harm of abuse. Breach of a NMO is a criminal offence punishable by a fine or up to five years’ imprisonment or both. While the Government understands the intention behind this proposal, it does not support automatically extending all NMOs following a conviction for breach. Decisions about whether a protective order remains necessary, and how long it should remain in force, are matters for the independent courts. Judges are best placed to assess the circumstances of each case, including the level of risk to the victim, any changes in circumstances, the needs of any children involved, and the protection required going forward. An automatic extension would remove the court’s ability to consider the individual facts of each case, and to assess whether the protection that is offered is sufficient in every case. It could also result in orders remaining in force for longer than is necessary in some cases, or for a period that does not reflect the particular circumstances of those involved. The Government believes that decisions about ongoing protection should continue to be made on a case-by-case basis by the courts. Importantly, NMOs do not automatically cease when they are breached. They remain in force until the expiry date is reached or they are varied or discharged by the court. Victims can apply to extend an order before it expires, and the family court can do so of its own motion in certain circumstances, for example if it is dealing with other family proceedings at the same time. Where a breach results in criminal proceedings, criminal courts already have powers to make restraining orders where they consider this necessary to protect a victim from harassment or abuse. Restraining orders can be imposed following either conviction or acquittal and can provide long-term protection where appropriate. This means victims do not necessarily need to rely on extending an existing NMO to receive ongoing protection. The Government also recognises the importance of ensuring that victims can access effective protection without having to navigate multiple court processes. This is one of the benefits of Domestic Abuse Protection Orders (DAPOs), which the Government has committed to rolling out across England and Wales. Unlike existing protective orders, DAPOs will be available across the criminal, family and civil courts. Once fully rolled out, courts will be able to vary existing DAPOs when acting on their own motion, even where the original DAPO was made by another court. This is intended to provide a more seamless protective order framework and reduce the need for victims to seek separate orders in different courts. The Government will continue to keep the operation of protective orders under review as part of our wider commitment to tackling domestic abuse and halving violence against women and girls within a decade. We remain committed to ensuring that victims receive effective protection while preserving the ability of the independent courts to determine what safeguards are necessary in individual cases. Ministry of Justice

Opened 17 May 2026. Text and figures from the official UK Government and Parliament petitions service. Sign it on petition.parliament.uk.

Signing is the easy half

A signature adds you to a count. A letter from your own address, in your own words, cannot be counted as one of a thousand identical emails. Write to your MP about this in a few minutes — free, and no account needed.

We use it to find the representatives who can act for you in United Kingdom.

Where its support is

  • Central Suffolk and North Ipswich279
  • South Suffolk232
  • Ipswich210
  • Ely and East Cambridgeshire185
  • Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket180
  • Hexham179
  • Mid Norfolk171
  • Chatham and Aylesford145
  • West Suffolk135
  • Gravesham133